Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Saturday Apr 18 2026 00:00
6 min
In a strategic development that could reshape regional dynamics, former US President Donald Trump announced prospects for direct talks between Israeli and Lebanese leaders. Should this materialize, it represents a historic juncture for two nations legally in a state of war for 78 years. However, these negotiations, as announced, will exclude a major party to the ongoing conflict: Hezbollah, an organization designated as a terrorist group by the United States, which has been engaged in intermittent conflict with Israel since the 1980s. This deliberate omission of a party with significant military and political influence raises serious questions about the sustainability of any peace agreement reached.
Trump announced on his platform "Truth Social" that he had invited Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanese President Michel Aoun to the White House for direct, high-level peace negotiations, the first of their kind in decades. This announcement coincided with an Israeli statement agreeing to a 10-day ceasefire with Lebanon, following nearly seven weeks of intense clashes with Hezbollah. Netanyahu expressed his readiness to participate in peace talks in Washington. The White House confirmed Aoun's agreement to the ceasefire, though Lebanese officials reported that Aoun refused a phone call with Netanyahu and had not officially commented on attending the Washington meeting.
Trump expressed his confidence in the mutual desire for peace in his post, stating, "Both sides want peace, and I believe it will happen soon!". This temporary halt in hostilities appears to open a window for the United States to continue its negotiations with Iran, Hezbollah's primary backer. Tehran insists that a ceasefire in Lebanon is a prerequisite for further talks with the US regarding its nuclear program, weapons systems, and control of the Strait of Hormuz. Washington, conversely, asserts that the Lebanese ceasefire is unrelated to Iran negotiations.
Hezbollah's absence from the negotiating table casts a long shadow of doubt over the likelihood of a successful peace agreement, and indeed, over the continuation of the current ceasefire. History tells similar stories: In 1983, a peace agreement was signed between the two countries, but it ultimately collapsed due to the opposition of Hezbollah and other factions. This was followed in 1993 by another US-backed peace effort that failed due to objections from Syria, which held considerable sway in Lebanon at the time, and the inability to secure guarantees regarding Hezbollah. In November 2024, an agreement was planned to disarm Hezbollah by the Lebanese government in exchange for an Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon and a halt to attacks on Lebanon. None of these objectives were achieved.
This round of ceasefire and potential negotiations might compel the Lebanese government into a decisive confrontation with Hezbollah, potentially leading to deep internal divisions. Lebanese law prohibits citizens from interacting with Israelis. Despite its relative decline in power, Hezbollah remains the most powerful armed force in Lebanon and an influential political actor with broad support from the Shiite community. Sam Heller, a researcher at the Century International Institute in Beirut, points out that "the current negotiation path, if it continues, will only lead to increased tensions." He adds, "There are real risks to Lebanon's internal stability and unity."
Within Israel, there is a widespread belief that the Lebanese government faces grave risks, with only two difficult options. Avner Golov, Vice President of the consulting firm MIND Israel and a former Israeli national security official, explains that "there are only two paths to disentangling Hezbollah: either Israeli military intervention, or a civil war in Lebanon."
The ceasefire announced on Thursday was met with a cool reception from Hezbollah, which continues to resist what it considers an Israeli "invasion" of Lebanese territory. The group asserts that any ceasefire must encompass all of Lebanon and not allow Israel freedom of movement within the country. A Hezbollah statement declared: "Israel's occupation of our land grants Lebanon and its people the right to resist."
Netanyahu, for his part, announced that Israel would maintain a buffer zone six miles wide in southern Lebanon to protect Israeli civilians from surprise Hezbollah attacks or direct anti-tank missile strikes. This temporary cessation of hostilities will provide immediate relief to Lebanon, where Israeli incursions and bombings have resulted in over 2,000 Lebanese deaths and the displacement of over a million people.
On the Israeli side, two Israeli civilians have been killed by Hezbollah rocket fire, and at least 12 Israeli soldiers have died in operations in Lebanon. Israel states that most of the casualties in Lebanon are Hezbollah members. Unlike previous Israeli-Lebanese peace attempts, the last two and a half years, since the Hamas-led attack on October 7, 2023, which triggered a regional conflict, have seen a significant weakening of the positions of both Iran and Hezbollah.
Public criticism of Hezbollah within Lebanon is growing. Following the assassination of Iran's Supreme Leader last month, Hezbollah's firing of rockets into Israel, dragging Lebanon back into war, intensified these criticisms. The Lebanese government has taken unprecedented measures to counter Hezbollah and Iranian influence, including banning the group's military activities and declaring the Iranian ambassador "persona non grata." However, the Lebanese army's weakness, the dire economic situation, and the fear of sparking an internal conflict similar to the 1975-1990 civil war limit the government's capacity for enforcement. Hezbollah continued to fire rockets and move weapons after the ban was issued, and the Iranian ambassador refused to be expelled. Israeli security officials believe that the Lebanese government and army genuinely wish to disarm Hezbollah. Some Israeli political officials hope for a comprehensive peace including economic cooperation and tourism. Netanyahu stated on Thursday that Israel "has an opportunity to reach a historic peace agreement with Lebanon."
Despite this, Israeli security officials still consider the Lebanese military overly cautious. Their reports indicate that nearly half of the approximately 8,000 rockets fired by Hezbollah in the current conflict originated from areas south of the Litani River, a region the Lebanese army had previously claimed was effectively demilitarized and under its control.
The ceasefire has sparked anger in northern Israel, where local officials expressed concerns that momentum for Israel to decisively disarm Hezbollah has been undermined once again. Polls by the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv show that most Israelis support continuing operations in Lebanon, regardless of developments in Iran. Moshe Davidovich, head of the largest regional council in northern Israel, stated, "Agreements will be signed in Washington with ties, while the cost is borne here by blood, destroyed homes, and displaced communities."
Ofer Guterman, a senior researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies, believes that an Israeli perception of "Iran pressuring the US to forge a ceasefire" would be a "negative signal." Following Israel's near-simultaneous strikes on 100 targets in Lebanon last week, Trump urged Netanyahu to reduce the intensity of strikes, fearing the collapse of a potential Iran ceasefire deal. "This allows Iran to present itself as a peacemaker, demonstrating its influence over the Lebanese strategic situation," Guterman said. "It might create an impression that Iran can reignite the Lebanese front at any time it wishes, just as it did to calm the fires."
Risk Warning: This article represents only the author’s views and is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice, investment research, or a recommendation to trade, nor does it represent the stance of the Markets.com platform. When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange), and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Leveraged products can result in capital loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Before trading, ensure you fully understand the risks involved and consider your investment objectives and level of experience. Trading cryptocurrency CFDs and spread bets is restricted for all UK retail clients.