Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Thursday Oct 8 2026 07:34
31 min

Buying the dip means buying an asset after its price falls, expecting it to recover. The appeal is straightforward: you enter at a lower price than before the decline. However, a cheaper entry is not automatically a bargain. The fall could reflect temporary selling pressure, deteriorating business conditions, or the beginning of a lasting downtrend. Understanding that distinction matters more than the size of the apparent discount.
This guide explains buying the dip, how to assess a potential setup, and how CFD trading changes the risks, with practical examples, strategy comparisons, and position-sizing calculations.

Buying the dip is the practice of purchasing an asset, or opening a long trading position, after its price declines in the expectation of a subsequent rise. The starting point is a lower price; the outcome depends on what happens next.
Suppose a share falls from $100 to $90. Buying at $90 gives you an entry 10% below the earlier price. If you later sell at $95, you make $5 per share before costs. If you sell at $80, you lose $10 per share. The earlier $100 price provides context, but it does not establish what the share should be worth.
There is no universal percentage that defines a dip. A small intraday decline might matter to a short-term trader, while an investor studying a daily or weekly chart may focus on a much larger pullback. The asset’s normal volatility also matters: the same percentage move can carry different significance across markets.
The holding period and product change how you assess the opportunity.
Approach | What you hold | Main consideration |
|---|---|---|
Share or ETF investing | Shares or fund units | Whether the longer-term investment thesis remains sound |
Shorter-term trading | A position targeting a price move | Entry conditions, execution, and a defined exit |
CFD trading | A derivative position without underlying ownership | Full exposure, margin, trading costs, and loss control |
You do not need to buy at the exact bottom or sell at a new high. A smaller rebound can produce a profit, provided the realised gain exceeds the relevant costs.
Buying the dip can produce profitable trades, but the phrase alone is not a complete strategy. Results depend on which declines you select, when you enter, how you manage losing positions, and what trading costs you incur.
A chart showing a successful rebound tells you what happened afterwards. A usable strategy must identify its conditions before the outcome is known.
One rationale is trend continuation. A market rises, retreats, and then resumes its advance. The trader expects the pullback to occur within a broader trend that remains intact.
Another rationale is mean reversion: the expectation that price will move back towards an average or another reference level after moving away from it. This differs from assuming every decline must reverse. An average can fall as the market changes, and prices can remain far from it.
Investors may also make a valuation case. For example, a lower share price could make an unchanged stream of expected earnings more attractive. However, if earnings expectations have deteriorated, the lower price may simply reflect that change. Price-based and valuation-based arguments should therefore be assessed separately.
Catching a falling knife describes buying into a sharp decline in an attempt to identify the bottom. The concern is that selling pressure has not yet stabilised.
Assessment | Potential pullback | Warning of a deeper decline |
|---|---|---|
Trend structure | Broader uptrend remains intact | Repeated lower highs and lower lows |
Price behaviour | Stabilisation around a relevant area | Continued selling through reference levels |
Fundamentals | Recovery thesis remains plausible | Material deterioration undermines the thesis |
These observations help organise an assessment; they do not predict the result. Even a convincing support area can fail.
To evaluate whether a buy the dip strategy works, define its rules and test more than a few selected winners. Include losing signals, spreads, slippage, holding costs, and maximum drawdown—the decline from an account or strategy’s peak to its subsequent low. Check performance in different market conditions and outside the period used to develop the rules.
Historical recoveries are not a promise of future recovery, particularly for an individual company whose business may permanently deteriorate.
Also read 7 Best CFD Trading Strategies For Beginners in 2026
A buy the dip strategy needs a reason to expect a rebound and a plan for being wrong. Establish the market context first, then define the entry, financial exposure, and exit conditions.
Start by asking why the price fell. A share declining with the wider market presents a different question from a company cutting its earnings guidance or reporting funding difficulties.
For stocks, examine whether the news changes expected earnings, debt repayment capacity, or the business outlook. For an index, consider broader drivers such as interest rates, economic expectations, and the performance of its major constituents. Neither type of explanation makes a rebound certain.
Next, match the chart to your intended holding period. A brief rebound on a five-minute chart may sit inside a daily downtrend. Higher highs and higher lows suggest an upward structure, while successive lower highs and lower lows suggest continued weakness. Assess the relevant timeframe rather than choosing whichever chart supports the trade you already want.
An entry trigger turns “the price looks low” into an observable condition. Examples include stabilisation near a previous swing low, a higher low after an initial bounce, or a move back above a level that was briefly lost.
Support zones and moving averages can provide reference points, but neither is a floor beneath the market. RSI can add momentum context: readings below 30 are traditionally described as oversold, yet the indicator can stay oversold during a strong decline.
Entering while prices are falling may offer a lower entry, but leaves less evidence of stabilisation. Waiting for confirmation means accepting a later entry and potentially missing the rebound. Your rules should make that trade-off explicit.
The invalidation point is the condition that would undermine your setup. For a short-term trade, it might be a break below the structure supporting the expected rebound.
Plan in this order:
For a simplified share-based example:
Position size = planned monetary risk ÷ loss per unit at the intended stop.
The calculation assumes execution at the intended stop. Costs and slippage require further allowance, while contract size and minimum trade increments affect the quantity available.
Before entering, check that you can explain the rebound thesis, the entry trigger, the reason to exit, and the effect of a worse-than-planned fill. If any is unclear, the setup is incomplete.

A worked example shows why the entry price, position size, and margin must be treated separately. The following numbers are entirely hypothetical and are not a current quote, a trading recommendation, or Markets.com’s quoted conditions.
Imagine a stock recently traded at $100, then declined towards $90. A trader considers a long CFD position after observing stabilisation, with an intended stop at $87 and a target at $96.
Item | Hypothetical assumption |
|---|---|
Recent reference high | $100 |
Entry price | $90 |
Intended stop | $87 |
Target price | $96 |
Trading-account equity | $5,000 |
Planned risk allowance | $50, or 1% of equity |
Exposure | 16 share-equivalent units |
Initial notional exposure | $1,440 |
The intended price risk is $90 − $87 = $3 per unit. Dividing $50 by $3 gives approximately 16.67 units. Assuming whole-unit increments, rounding down to 16 gives planned price risk of $48 before costs.
The 1% allowance illustrates the arithmetic rather than prescribing a suitable risk level. An actual CFD’s unit value, minimum quantity, and contract specification must be checked before applying this calculation.
For this simplified long position, price-only profit or loss equals:
(Exit price − entry price) × share-equivalent units.
Outcome | Calculation | Price-only P&L |
|---|---|---|
Rebound reaches $96 | ($96 − $90) × 16 | +$96 |
Stop executes at $87 | ($87 − $90) × 16 | −$48 |
Gap leads to execution at $85 | ($85 − $90) × 16 | −$80 |
The target offers $6 per unit against $3 of intended stop risk: a 2:1 reward-to-risk ratio before costs. That ratio describes the planned pay-off, not the likelihood of winning. Repeated unsuccessful entries can still lose money.
Now assume a hypothetical margin requirement of 20%. Initial margin would be $1,440 × 20% = $288. The $48 stop loss would equal about 16.7% of that initial margin, although only 0.96% of the assumed $5,000 account equity.
The main risk is continued decline. A sensible entry explanation helps organise a trade, but only exposure limits and execution planning address the financial consequences when that explanation proves wrong.
A pullback can become a lasting downtrend. If the business or market outlook changes, the price may never return to the level that originally looked attractive.
Adding to a losing position reduces its average entry price but increases exposure. Suppose you buy ten shares at $90 and another ten at $80. Your average becomes $85, but a further fall to $70 creates a $300 loss across twenty shares, rather than $200 on the original ten. The lower average does not erase the increased commitment.
Several related positions can also concentrate risk. Buying dips in multiple companies from the same sector may leave the account exposed to one shared driver.
Practical controls include:
Leverage allows a position larger than the margin committed, magnifying the financial effect of a price move relative to that margin. Falling account equity can leave insufficient funds to maintain open positions, leading to forced closure before a hoped-for rebound.
Regulatory protections have specific scopes. For example, the FCA’s UK retail CFD framework includes leverage restrictions, account-level margin close-out requirements, and negative balance protection. These measures do not prevent losses within the account, and conditions vary by jurisdiction and client classification.
Also read What Are Leverage & Margin in Trading and How to Manage Risks?
Earnings, economic announcements, and unexpected news can cause abrupt price changes. Wide spreads and limited liquidity can make entry or exit more expensive than expected.
An ordinary stop-loss does not guarantee its execution price. Investor.gov’s order guide explains that a stock stop order becomes a market order when triggered; execution can differ from the stop level. Check the relevant CFD provider’s execution terms as well.
Position size should reflect the intended stop distance, with additional allowance for execution uncertainty. Reasons to skip a setup include an unclear rebound thesis, broken trend structure, poor liquidity, or insufficient potential reward after costs.
Buying the dip uses a price decline as part of the purchase decision. Other approaches use a calendar, an existing position, or evidence of upward momentum instead.
Approach | Purchase trigger | Main distinction |
|---|---|---|
Buying the dip | A decline meeting predefined criteria | Entry depends on a price-based assessment |
Dollar-cost averaging | A fixed schedule | Regular purchases regardless of market direction |
Averaging down | Adding below an existing entry | Lower average entry with greater exposure |
Breakout buying | Price crosses a defined level | Entry seeks evidence of upward momentum |
Under Investor.gov’s definition, dollar-cost averaging invests equal amounts at regular intervals. For example, a hypothetical $200 monthly purchase continues whether prices rise or fall. Buying only after a 10% decline is a different, price-triggered rule.
Dip buying can open a new position or add to an existing one. Adding below your original entry involves averaging down; opening a new position does not, and averaging down itself says nothing about whether the added exposure is justified.
Breakout buying accepts a higher entry in exchange for evidence that price has crossed a defined threshold. The risk is that the breakout fails; dip buying instead faces the risk that the decline continues.
Waiting for a dip can also leave capital uninvested while a market rises. A later decline may still leave prices above today’s level. This opportunity cost belongs alongside the potential benefit of a lower entry.
No approach is universally superior. The relevant comparison is between clearly defined rules, their costs, and the losses those rules can produce.
Opening a CFD account on Markets.com takes just a few minutes, whether on the website or mobile app. Follow these five steps to go from sign-up to your first trade.
Step 1: Sign Up for an Account
Visit Markets.com or download the app, click "Create Account," and register with your email or a Google/Facebook/Apple account.

Step 2: Verify Your Identity (KYC)
Complete the KYC check by entering your personal details and uploading proof of identity and address.
Step 3: Fund Your Account
Deposit via card, bank transfer, e-wallet, Apple Pay, or Google Pay. The minimum deposit is $100.

Step 4: Choose a Market and Place Your Trade
Select an asset like gold, forex, or shares. Choose Buy if you expect the price to rise, Sell if you expect it to fall, and set a stop-loss and take-profit before confirming.

Step 5: Manage and Close Your Positions
Monitor open trades, adjust risk settings as needed, and close positions manually or automatically when targets are hit.
New to Markets.com? Claim a generous deposit bonus on your first trade. Hurry—this offer is only available for a limited time.
Buying the dip means entering after a decline because you expect a rebound, but a lower price alone is insufficient. A useful plan explains why recovery is plausible, identifies an entry condition, and sets the position size and exit before capital is committed. Investors must reassess fundamentals, while CFD traders also need to consider leverage, margin, execution, and holding costs. Markets.com’s instrument information can help you check these mechanics, but it cannot establish whether a dip will recover. The decision to wait or skip a trade remains valid when the evidence or potential reward does not justify the risk.
There is no universal percentage. A meaningful decline depends on the stock’s volatility, timeframe, and reason for falling. A percentage threshold can define a screening rule, but it does not establish value or provide sufficient evidence of a rebound.
An RSI below 30 is commonly described as oversold, but it does not guarantee a reversal. Prices can continue falling while RSI remains low. Traders may combine it with trend structure, support, and price stabilisation rather than treating it as a standalone entry signal.
A bear market can produce temporary rebounds, but continued declines make dip buying difficult. Traders need to distinguish a short rebound trade from a longer investment thesis. Neither a low entry price nor a longer holding period guarantees that the asset will recover.
No. Buying the dip depends on a decline or predefined price condition, while dollar-cost averaging normally invests a fixed amount at regular intervals. The approaches can overlap, but their purchase triggers differ, and neither removes the risk of losses.
A CFD cannot be assumed to remain open indefinitely. Overnight financing, changing margin requirements, and losses that reduce account equity may affect the position or lead to closure. A recovery thesis must therefore account for both market risk and the mechanics of CFD trading.
Fidelity, Relative Strength Index (RSI) — https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/trading-investing/technical-analysis/technical-indicator-guide/RSI
Investor.gov, Dollar Cost Averaging — https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/investing-basics/glossary/dollar-cost-averaging
Investor.gov, Types of Orders — https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/investing-basics/how-stock-markets-work/types-orders
Financial Conduct Authority, PS19/18: Restricting contracts for different products sold to retail clients — https://www.fca.org.uk/publications/policy-statements/ps19-18-restricting-contract-difference-products
Risk Warning: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, investment research, or a recommendation to trade. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Markets.com. When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange), and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Leveraged products can result in capital loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Before trading, ensure you fully understand the risks involved and consider your investment objectives and level of experience. Cryptocurrency CFD trading restrictions may apply depending on jurisdiction.