Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Friday Jul 10 2026 06:20
6 min

Brent crude oil was heading for a strong weekly advance on Friday as geopolitical tension in the Gulf kept supply security at the centre of market attention.
The international benchmark traded near $76 per barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate held close to $72. Reuters reported Brent at $76.24 and WTI at $72.04 on Friday, with Brent on course for a weekly rise of around 6% and WTI set for a gain of about 5%.
The move reflects a renewed risk premium in crude markets after the latest escalation between the United States and Iran. Although prices have eased from their midweek highs, oil has remained supported by concerns that shipping through the Strait of Hormuz may not normalise quickly.
For traders, the key issue is no longer only military confrontation itself. The market is also assessing whether insurance costs, tanker availability and shipping confidence could restrict energy flows even without a formal closure of the strait.
That distinction matters. A short-lived security disruption may support prices temporarily, while sustained limits on tanker traffic could have a much larger effect on crude and liquefied natural gas markets.
The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the most important energy routes in the world. It links Gulf producers with global buyers and is particularly important for crude oil, refined fuel and LNG shipments.
The US Energy Information Administration has previously described the strait as a critical energy chokepoint, with around one-fifth of global LNG trade passing through the route in 2024, largely from Persian Gulf producers to Asian markets.
That explains why even limited disruption can affect market sentiment. If shipowners delay voyages, insurers raise war-risk premiums or charterers reroute cargoes, the effect can be felt before any physical supply loss appears in official inventory data.
Recent reports of renewed US-Iran fighting have therefore kept traders cautious. The concern is that further attacks on commercial shipping, ports or nearby infrastructure could make the market reassess the probability of a broader supply shock.
At the same time, the market reaction has been more measured than during earlier phases of the conflict. Brent has risen strongly this week, but it has not returned to the extreme levels seen during previous moments of panic. This suggests that traders are pricing a disruption risk rather than assuming a full-scale interruption of Gulf energy exports.
The rally has also been restrained by signals that the conflict may remain limited. President Donald Trump’s comments that he did not expect the war to restart in full helped reduce the risk of a more disorderly oil move, according to market reports.
Another factor limiting the upside is that reported US strikes have focused on military targets rather than Iranian oil fields, refineries or export terminals. As long as energy infrastructure remains largely outside the direct line of attack, traders may hesitate to price in a major supply loss.
This creates a more balanced market setup. On one side, shipping disruption and military uncertainty support crude prices. On the other, expectations of diplomacy, spare production capacity and the absence of direct damage to major oil facilities prevent buyers from chasing the rally too aggressively.
The result is a market that remains highly sensitive to headlines. A single report of further tanker disruption could lift prices quickly. But signs that shipping lanes are reopening or that talks are resuming could remove part of this week’s risk premium.
Although Brent is on track for a notable weekly gain, the rally remains vulnerable to a reversal if the immediate supply threat fades.
Oil has often reacted sharply to Middle East geopolitical risk, but the price impact usually depends on whether the event changes actual supply flows. A temporary rise in insurance costs or tanker delays may support prices for several sessions. A sustained disruption to export capacity would have a much larger and more durable effect.
This is why the current move should be interpreted carefully. Brent’s 6% weekly gain shows that traders are taking Hormuz risk seriously. It does not necessarily mean the market is pricing a lasting shortage.
Demand conditions also remain relevant. If concerns over global growth or inflation increase, they may offset some of the geopolitical support. Higher oil prices can themselves become a macroeconomic risk if they feed inflation expectations and reduce expectations for monetary easing.
For WTI, the picture is similar. US crude has benefited from the same geopolitical risk premium, but domestic inventory trends, refinery demand and broader dollar movements could still influence near-term pricing.
The next move in crude is likely to depend less on routine inventory data and more on whether the Strait of Hormuz can operate safely.
If tanker flows improve and diplomatic channels remain open, Brent could give back part of this week’s advance. In that scenario, traders may refocus on supply growth, demand indicators and central-bank expectations.
If the security situation deteriorates, however, the market could quickly price a larger disruption premium. Any confirmed attack on tankers, Gulf export terminals or energy infrastructure would likely increase volatility across Brent, WTI and refined product markets.
For now, oil remains in a headline-driven range. Supply fears are supporting prices, but confidence that the conflict may remain contained is preventing a more aggressive rally.
That balance leaves Brent crude supported near recent highs, but not without downside risk. The market is watching Hormuz closely, because the difference between a temporary shipping delay and a prolonged energy-route disruption could determine whether this week’s rally extends or unwinds.
Risk Warning: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, investment research, or a recommendation to trade. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Markets.com. When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange), and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Leveraged products can result in capital loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Before trading, ensure you fully understand the risks involved and consider your investment objectives and level of experience. Cryptocurrency CFD trading restrictions may apply depending on jurisdiction.