Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Thursday Oct 8 2026 03:41
6 min


Crude oil prices recovered in early Asian trading on Thursday, October 8, as renewed security threats in the Middle East and disruption to US offshore production brought supply concerns back into focus.
At 00:09 GMT, front-month West Texas Intermediate crude futures were up around 1% at $89.14 per barrel, while front-month Brent futures rose approximately 1% to $101.24. These were early-session quotes rather than closing prices.
The rebound followed a weaker finish on Wednesday. Brent settled at $100.20 a barrel, down 38 cents, or 0.38%, while WTI lost $1.16, or 1.3%, to close at $88.28. The decline came as the International Energy Agency backed faster emergency stock releases to ease pressure on fuel supplies.
The reversal highlights the competing forces shaping the market. Additional barrels from reserves could help meet immediate demand, but continuing threats to production and transport routes leave the recovery in supply exposed to further disruption.
Fresh attacks have reinforced concerns about the security of regional energy transport. Houthi militants claimed attacks that damaged two airports in Saudi Arabia, adding to tensions around the southern Arabian Peninsula and nearby shipping routes.
Separately, a tanker off Qatar’s northern coast reported being struck by multiple projectiles on Wednesday. The incident occurred inside the Gulf, west of the Strait of Hormuz, amid continuing threats against commercial vessels.
For oil markets, the significance extends beyond the immediate damage from any single attack. Repeated incidents can discourage vessel movements, complicate loading schedules and make deliveries less predictable.
Security risks also affect the cost of moving oil that remains available. The EIA’s October outlook identified higher insurance costs, elevated tanker rates and longer voyages as factors increasing delivered crude costs. Alternative routes help maintain exports, but they do not necessarily restore the speed or economics of normal transport.
This creates a distinction between recovering export volumes and a fully functioning supply chain. More oil reaching buyers can ease shortages while freight costs and security concerns continue to support prices.
The IEA’s October 7 announcement provided a potential counterweight to supply disruption. Member governments supported accelerating releases pledged under the March 2026 collective action and prioritising diesel where possible.
The agency said approximately 325 million barrels had already been released. Completing outstanding commitments could bring around 100 million additional barrels to market under that existing programme. The statement therefore concerns delivery of previously pledged stocks and should not be read as a newly authorised 100-million-barrel intervention.
The composition of those deliveries remains important. The IEA did not specify how much would be crude oil and how much would be diesel, leaving uncertainty over the direct benefit to each part of the energy market.
As a market implication, faster crude deliveries could help refiners secure feedstock, while diesel releases could address immediate shortages of finished fuel. The effect will depend on when stocks arrive, where they are delivered and how well they match demand.
Emergency reserves can bridge temporary supply gaps. A sustained improvement would also require reliable production, refining and export operations.
US inventory figures added another source of support for crude during Wednesday’s session.
Commercial crude inventories fell by 3.2 million barrels to 424.1 million barrels in the week ended October 2. That contrasted with expectations for a 1.7-million-barrel increase, making the release tighter than anticipated.
An unexpected draw suggests that the balance between incoming supply and demand was firmer than the market had expected for that reporting week. It does not establish a lasting trend, but it reduces the reassurance that a stock build might otherwise have provided.
Storm risks added uncertainty around near-term US output. The Gulf of Mexico produced approximately 2.05 million barrels per day in September, representing around 15% of US crude production, making offshore interruptions relevant to the wider supply balance.
The eventual impact will depend on the duration of shutdowns and whether facilities can restart promptly. Temporary precautionary closures would have different consequences from damage that keeps production offline for an extended period.
There is also evidence of improving supply availability.
The EIA estimated that Middle Eastern crude production shut-ins declined to 4.8 million barrels per day in September, from 5.8 million in August and a peak of 10.9 million in May. Partial restoration of Saudi Arabia’s East-West pipeline and alternative export arrangements helped improve flows.
That recovery offers a reason for caution when interpreting every security incident as the start of another sustained price surge. If exports continue improving and reserve deliveries accelerate, additional supply could offset part of the disruption risk.
Nevertheless, the EIA raised its fourth-quarter Brent spot-price projection to an average of $105 a barrel, reflecting continuing constraints. That figure is a quarterly forecast, rather than a near-term futures target.
Oil’s early rebound reflects an unresolved balance between supply relief and operational risk. Faster stock releases and recovering exports could ease pressure, while further attacks or prolonged US production interruptions could reverse that progress. The pace and reliability of actual deliveries remain central to whether the latest gains can hold.
Risk Warning: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, investment research, or a recommendation to trade. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Markets.com. When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange), and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Leveraged products can result in capital loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Before trading, ensure you fully understand the risks involved and consider your investment objectives and level of experience. Cryptocurrency CFD trading restrictions may apply depending on jurisdiction.