Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Thursday Oct 8 2026 03:35
11 min

SpaceX is reportedly seeking $40 billion in new financing to purchase Nvidia artificial intelligence chips, marking one of the largest funding packages yet linked to the global AI infrastructure boom.
The proposed transaction would include approximately $10 billion in bank loans and $30 billion in investment-grade bonds, according to people familiar with the discussions. Apollo Global Management is expected to lead the financing, while bond manager Pimco has also participated in preliminary talks.
The transaction is still being negotiated and is expected to close in 2027. SpaceX, Nvidia, Apollo and Pimco have not publicly confirmed the final terms, meaning the size and structure could change.
SpaceX stock fell 2.5% to $167.60 following the reports, while Nvidia declined approximately 0.7%. SpaceX shares remain well below their 52-week high of $225.64.
The reported package would be divided between bank and bond markets:
Financing Source | Reported Amount |
|---|---|
Bank loans | $10 billion
|
Investment-grade bonds
| $30 billion
|
Total financing
| $40 billion |
Apollo is expected to arrange the transaction and distribute the debt among institutional investors. Pimco is reportedly among the large fixed-income managers considering participation.
The deal may also use Nvidia chips or related computing infrastructure as collateral. High-end GPUs retain significant resale value because demand continues to exceed supply, allowing lenders to treat the hardware as a financeable asset rather than a conventional operating expense.
This type of arrangement is becoming more common across the AI industry. Instead of paying entirely from existing cash flow, technology companies and data-center operators are financing processors, power infrastructure and server capacity through loans, bonds and private-credit vehicles.
However, SpaceX’s proposed financing is unusually large. The $40 billion package is close to its projected 2026 revenue of approximately $44.5 billion, illustrating the scale of the company’s AI ambitions and the financial risks involved.
SpaceX is expanding beyond rockets and satellite connectivity into artificial intelligence, cloud computing and data-center infrastructure.
Elon Musk has described Nvidia’s architecture as the preferred platform for the company’s AI workloads. SpaceX is expected to receive a significant allocation of Nvidia’s next-generation Vera Rubin systems, which are designed for training advanced models and running large-scale inference workloads.
The chips could support several parts of Musk’s growing technology ecosystem:
SpaceX has set increasingly aggressive computing targets. The company is reportedly seeking to increase its AI capacity from approximately 1.4 gigawatts in the second quarter to 2 gigawatts by the end of 2026, with the longer-term target potentially reaching 10 gigawatts by the end of 2027.
Hardware would represent most of the investment required to reach those goals. One outside estimate cited by MarketWatch suggested that developing 10 gigawatts of computing capacity could cost as much as $336 billion, with Nvidia systems accounting for the majority of the total.
The $40 billion financing may therefore represent only one stage of a much larger capital-spending program.
Bond investors reacted more negatively than equity investors to the financing plan.
SpaceX’s five-year credit-default-swap spread increased to a record 194 basis points, up from approximately 110 basis points when the contracts began trading in June.
At 194 basis points, it costs roughly $19,400 annually to insure $1 million of SpaceX debt against default. A wider CDS spread indicates that investors are demanding more compensation to accept the company’s credit risk.
SpaceX bonds also weakened. The spread between the company’s 2056 bond yield and comparable US Treasury yields increased to approximately 2.36 percentage points, compared with around 1.75 percentage points in June.
The reaction does not mean investors expect SpaceX to default. The company maintains an investment-grade credit rating and has substantial cash and growing revenue.
Instead, the movement shows that creditors are becoming less comfortable with the speed at which SpaceX is adding capital-intensive projects to its existing rocket, satellite and communications businesses.
SpaceX already completed a $25 billion bond offering in June, shortly after raising approximately $86 billion through its initial public offering.
The inaugural bond transaction was increased from an original target of $20 billion after attracting almost $89 billion in investor orders. It included several maturities, with interest rates ranging from 5.35% for notes due in 2031 to 6.65% for the longest-dated debt.
The June proceeds were primarily intended to repay an existing bridge-loan facility, cover transaction costs and support general corporate purposes. SpaceX confirmed that the notes were unsecured obligations ranking equally with its other unsubordinated debt.
S&P Global assigned the bonds a BBB rating with a stable outlook. The agency expected adjusted leverage to remain below two times earnings, but it also warned that aggressive investment would produce significantly negative free cash flow.
The proposed $40 billion package would therefore arrive only months after SpaceX’s first major entry into public debt markets. Although part of the earlier bond sale refinanced existing borrowing, the rapid return for additional financing is contributing to concerns about long-term capital requirements.
For Nvidia, a SpaceX order of this size would reinforce the argument that demand for advanced AI accelerators remains supply constrained.
SpaceX has committed to building its AI infrastructure around Nvidia technology, making it both an important customer and a strategic partner. Nvidia is also a SpaceX shareholder following its earlier investment in xAI, which was subsequently combined with SpaceX.
The financing arrangement could generate several benefits for Nvidia:
However, supplier-backed financing and debt-funded chip purchases introduce new risks. If customers cannot produce sufficient revenue from their AI infrastructure, they may reduce future orders or attempt to renegotiate commitments.
Nvidia’s growth could consequently become more exposed to the financial condition of its largest buyers, rather than depending only on demand for its technology.
SpaceX is not alone in turning to capital markets to finance AI development.
Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Oracle and several data-center operators have issued debt or entered private-credit arrangements to pay for processors, servers, electricity and construction. Nvidia has also raised capital and worked with financial institutions on structures designed to help customers purchase its systems.
More than $300 billion of debt linked to AI and data-center projects had reportedly been issued during 2026 by June. JPMorgan estimates that total AI infrastructure investment could reach $5.5 trillion by 2030, with approximately $4.1 trillion potentially financed through debt.
Borrowing is not necessarily a negative signal. Long-lived infrastructure is frequently financed with debt, particularly when it can produce predictable future revenue.
The concern is that AI processors depreciate more quickly than conventional infrastructure. A data-center building may operate for decades, while an advanced GPU could be surpassed by a newer generation within several years.
Companies must therefore generate returns quickly enough to cover interest costs before their hardware loses economic value.
Trade Hot Stocks 24/7
Follow the moves in leading tech, AI and semiconductor stocks with 24/7 CFD trading on selected shares at Markets.com. Explore 24/7 stock CFDs today.
The proposed transaction presents investors with sharply different scenarios.
In the bullish case, SpaceX uses Nvidia’s systems to establish a major AI-computing business alongside Starlink, Starshield and launch services. Rapid revenue growth could make the additional borrowing manageable, while AI and cloud services could diversify the company beyond capital-intensive space operations.
SpaceX has previously said it aims to reach a $100 billion annualized revenue run rate by the end of 2026, although investors will need to distinguish between annualized targets, contracted revenue and audited annual sales.
In the bearish case, infrastructure costs rise faster than revenue. Higher interest expenses, processor depreciation and continued spending on Starship, Starlink and data centers could keep free cash flow negative for longer than expected.
The most important factors to monitor will include:
SpaceX’s $40 billion Nvidia financing plan demonstrates that demand for AI infrastructure remains exceptionally strong. It also highlights a transition in the AI investment cycle: companies are moving beyond spending operating cash and increasingly relying on bondholders, banks and private-credit investors.
Whether the strategy succeeds will depend on SpaceX’s ability to convert massive computing capacity into recurring revenue before debt costs and technological depreciation begin to outweigh the benefits.
Risk Warning: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, investment research, or a recommendation to trade. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Markets.com. When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange), and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Leveraged products can result in capital loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Before trading, ensure you fully understand the risks involved and consider your investment objectives and level of experience. Cryptocurrency CFD trading restrictions may apply depending on jurisdiction.