Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Tuesday Apr 21 2026 00:00
6 min
1. Navigating the Fallout: Kuwait's Force Majeure and the Strait of Hormuz Energy Crisis
1.1 Introduction: A Disruptive Shock to the Global Energy Market
1.2 Shipping Disruption and Production Decline: The Repercussions of Regional Conflict
1.4 Production Recovery and Technical Constraints: A Gradual Resumption Path
Foreign media reports, citing obtained documents, indicate that the state-owned Kuwait Petroleum Corporation (KPC) formally notified its clients of the activation of this clause in their contracts last Friday. The force majeure provision allows suppliers to suspend or delay deliveries under exceptional circumstances beyond their control. However, an informed source clarified that this action does not necessarily imply a complete cessation of supplies, but rather a mechanism for managing commitments under the prevailing conditions.
As a consequence of the Strait of Hormuz closure and the impacts of Iranian actions, several countries in the region have reduced their output of crude oil, natural gas, and refined products. The U.S. government projected earlier this month that over 9 million barrels per day of oil production capacity could be forced offline in April.
Kuwait's oil infrastructure has been targeted multiple times, leading to a decline in its production to levels not seen since the Iraqi invasion in the early 1990s. An unnamed source indicated that even if the conflict subsides, a full recovery of production capacity will take time, and exports may continue to face pressure.
Despite these challenges, Kuwaiti officials have expressed optimism, stating that production is expected to return to pre-conflict levels within months once the conflict concludes.
Even under the assumption of successful peace negotiations, no new conflicts emerging, and infrastructure damage not exceeding expectations, a full return to pre-conflict operational levels could still require several years.
Analysis by Reuters suggests that the pace of recovery for the region's oil and gas sector will depend not only on diplomatic progress between Washington and Tehran but also on logistical conditions, the availability of tanker insurance, freight rates, and the willingness of shipowners to assume transit risks.
Once the Strait of Hormuz returns to normal operations, the approximately 260 tankers currently anchored in the Gulf will be among the first to depart, carrying an estimated 170 million barrels of oil and 1.2 million tons of liquefied natural gas (LNG), according to data from analytics firm Kpler. A significant portion of these initial cargoes is expected to be destined for Asia, a region that typically receives about 80% of the Gulf's oil exports and 90% of its LNG shipments.
As these vessels gradually depart, over 300 empty tankers moored in the Gulf of Oman will enter the Persian Gulf, heading towards loading terminals such as Saudi Arabia's Ras Tanura and Iraq's Basra oil terminals.
The primary task for these tankers will be to alleviate the pressure on onshore storage facilities, which have rapidly filled up during the Strait's closure. Data from the International Energy Agency (IEA) indicates that commercial crude oil inventories in the Gulf region currently stand at approximately 262 million barrels, equivalent to about 20 days of interrupted production, leaving little room for further build-up before exports resume.
Tanker logistics are expected to prolong the recovery of energy flows. For instance, a typical voyage from the Middle East to India's west coast takes around 20 days, while routes to China, Japan, and South Korea could take two months or longer.
The supply of tankers may also be constrained. Some vessels have been repurposed to transport oil and LNG from the Americas to Asia, with such voyages potentially lasting up to 40 days.
Under more favorable conditions, the rebalancing of the global tanker fleet and the restoration of Gulf loading operations to a pre-conflict pace are still expected to be uneven, likely requiring at least 8 to 12 weeks.
This process requires careful coordination, including the return of thousands of technicians and contractors evacuated during the unrest. Concurrently, the speed of production recovery will also depend on the storage capacity of coastal terminals, creating a feedback loop between shipping and upstream activities.
The IEA estimates that approximately half of the Gulf's oil and gas fields still possess sufficient reservoir pressure to return to pre-conflict production levels within roughly two weeks. An additional 30% of production capacity, contingent upon a stabilized security environment and restored supply chains, might require up to six weeks.
The remaining approximately 20% of production capacity, equating to about 2.5 to 3 million barrels per day, faces technical challenges. Low reservoir pressure, equipment damage, and electricity supply limitations mean that some fields may take several months to recover.
Damage to critical energy assets has also been severe, including Qatar's Ras Laffan LNG hub, where approximately 17% of its production capacity has been affected, with repairs potentially taking up to five years. Some aging and structurally complex oil wells, particularly in Iraq and Kuwait, may be unable to regain their previous production levels.
Ongoing supply losses could be offset by drilling new wells in the region, but this process is expected to take at least a year and is dependent on an improved security environment.
Analysts suggest that once the backlog of tankers is cleared and oil fields stabilize production, Iraq and Kuwait are expected to lift their force majeure declarations.
Risk Warning: this article represents only the author’s views and is for reference only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial guidance, nor does it represent the stance of the Markets.com platform.When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange) and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and could result in capital loss.Past performance is not indicative of any future results. This information is provided for informative purposes only and should not be construed to be investment advice. Trading cryptocurrency CFDs and spread bets is restricted for all UK retail clients.