Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Tuesday Aug 4 2026 03:19
4 min

Oil prices fell sharply on Monday after the United States and Iran separately signalled progress toward negotiations over shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, raising hopes that more Middle Eastern crude could reach the global market.
West Texas Intermediate crude for September delivery declined 5.1%, or $4.33, to settle at $80.34 per barrel. October Brent crude fell 4.7% to $83.77 per barrel. The change in Brent’s front-month contract contributed to an apparent 7% decline from the previous front-month settlement.
European natural gas prices also reacted to the diplomatic signals, falling as much as 6.3% during the session before recovering part of their losses.
Details of the negotiations remain uncertain. U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday that Washington and Tehran were discussing an agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important energy transportation routes.
Trump said the negotiations represented Iran’s “last chance” after he suspended a major planned military operation. He suggested that reopening the strait would be the first stage of a wider diplomatic process that could later address Iran’s nuclear activities.
Iran, however, denied that direct discussions with the United States were underway. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said Tehran had not sent negotiators abroad and had no meetings scheduled with U.S. officials.
Instead, Iran said it was holding talks with Oman over the creation of a temporary maritime route through the strait. Tehran indicated that those discussions had made progress, but it did not commit to allowing vessels to move freely through the waterway.
The conflicting accounts left investors uncertain about whether a formal agreement was close. Nevertheless, the willingness of Washington to delay military action and Iran’s discussions with Oman reduced immediate fears of a wider attack on regional energy infrastructure.
Some vessels continue to travel through the Strait of Hormuz, but shipping activity remains disrupted and the risks facing commercial tankers are still elevated.
Traffic through the passage slowed following reports of attacks on vessels. Several ships have also altered their routes elsewhere in the region because of security threats in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden.
Before the latest conflict escalated, approximately one-fifth of global oil supplies passed through the Strait of Hormuz. Any prolonged disruption could restrict exports from major producers including Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates and Iran.
The strait’s strategic importance has created a large geopolitical risk premium in oil prices. Traders have responded quickly to signs of either escalation or de-escalation, producing sharp price movements even when the underlying supply situation has not materially changed.
Monday’s decline reflected expectations that negotiations could restore at least some shipping activity and reduce the possibility of widespread damage to oil fields, export terminals and other energy infrastructure.
The market reaction suggests traders are assigning greater probability to a diplomatic solution, but there is still no evidence that Iran is prepared to restore unrestricted passage through the strait.
The United States and Iran also disagree over whether direct negotiations are taking place. That gap increases the risk that expectations for an agreement may prove premature.
Oil prices could rebound rapidly if talks with Oman fail, the United States resumes military operations or attacks cause further disruption to tanker traffic. Conversely, a verified agreement that restores commercial shipping could remove more of the geopolitical premium currently embedded in crude prices.
For now, the latest diplomatic signals have eased immediate supply fears and pushed WTI back toward $80 per barrel. The future direction of the oil price will depend on whether the negotiations produce a workable shipping arrangement or merely postpone another round of military escalation.
Risk Warning: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, investment research, or a recommendation to trade. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Markets.com. When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange), and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Leveraged products can result in capital loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Before trading, ensure you fully understand the risks involved and consider your investment objectives and level of experience. Cryptocurrency CFD trading restrictions may apply depending on jurisdiction.