Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Wednesday Jul 29 2026 06:33
7 min

Oil prices jumped by more than $3 per barrel on Wednesday, July 29, as renewed military action in the Middle East restored concerns about Gulf energy supplies and major shipping routes.
Brent crude futures climbed $3.30, or 3.9%, to $87.39 per barrel by 03:00 GMT. US West Texas Intermediate advanced $3.05, or 3.8%, to $82.31.
The sharp recovery followed Tuesday’s sell-off, when Brent fell 4.8% to $84.09 and WTI dropped 4.1% to $79.26. Traders had reduced the geopolitical premium after several days without direct attacks between the United States and Iran raised hopes that diplomatic efforts could end the conflict.
Those expectations weakened rapidly after fresh missile attacks and joint US-Saudi strikes returned the focus to regional supply risks. The market began rebuilding its risk premium even though there had been no confirmed large-scale loss of oil production at the time of writing.
The rapid reversal highlights how sensitive crude remains to military and diplomatic developments. Traders are being forced to balance the possibility of negotiations against the continuing threat to Gulf oil facilities, tankers and export routes.
US Central Command said American and Saudi aircraft struck logistics and weapons facilities in eastern Iraq following more than 30 drone attacks over a 72-hour period. The attacks had targeted US forces and Saudi energy infrastructure.
American forces also intercepted Iranian ballistic missiles aimed at military positions in the region. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards later said missiles had been launched at a US air base and a Central Command facility in Jordan.
The renewed fighting reduced expectations that the temporary pause in attacks would develop into a lasting ceasefire. Previous interruptions in the conflict have proved fragile, making traders cautious about treating a short period without strikes as evidence of a permanent reduction in risk.
The rebound in oil prices therefore reflects a reassessment of how quickly the region can return to stability. Even without a confirmed production outage, repeated attacks on military and energy targets increase the probability of accidental escalation or damage to important infrastructure.
Saudi Arabia is particularly important because it is one of the world’s largest crude exporters and holds substantial spare production capacity. Any sustained disruption to Saudi facilities could remove physical barrels from the market while also limiting the country’s ability to compensate for lost production elsewhere.
The Strait of Hormuz remains the most important source of uncertainty for the oil market. The waterway normally carries approximately one-fifth of globally traded oil, connecting major Gulf producers with customers in Asia, Europe and other regions.
Traffic through the strait has remained subdued during the conflict despite diplomatic efforts to restore normal commercial shipping. Tanker operators must consider the risk of missile attacks, vessel seizures, higher insurance costs and possible delays before entering the area.
Oman has been attempting to establish a framework for managing traffic through Hormuz, but Iran rejected a proposal backed by Gulf states and presented an alternative arrangement that would provide Tehran with greater control over shipping lanes.
The absence of an agreement means a military pause alone may not be enough to restore normal export flows. Traders are likely to monitor physical tanker traffic closely rather than relying solely on statements about negotiations.
Renewed Houthi activity around the Red Sea adds another layer of risk. The Bab el-Mandeb Strait connects the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden and represents a second important route for energy shipments.
Simultaneous disruption around Hormuz and the Red Sea could force more tankers to avoid established routes, increasing travel times, freight costs and pressure on available vessels.
The geopolitical escalation arrived as the US market was already showing signs of tighter near-term crude supply.
Preliminary industry figures indicated that nationwide crude inventories declined by approximately 3.3 million barrels during the week ending July 24. Gasoline stocks increased by 918,000 barrels, while distillate inventories rose by 355,000 barrels.
The crude draw strengthened the rebound ahead of the official Energy Information Administration report. If confirmed, the decline would suggest that refiners and exporters continued to absorb available barrels despite uncertainty surrounding global economic growth.
Lower inventories also reduce the market’s ability to absorb an unexpected supply interruption. Damage to Saudi facilities, another tanker attack or an extended reduction in Hormuz traffic could lead buyers to rebuild protective positions quickly.
However, the increases in gasoline and distillate stocks may limit some of the bullish impact. Continued growth in refined fuel inventories could indicate that consumer demand is not keeping pace with refinery production.
Oil prices also received support from the possibility that OPEC+ will pause production increases for three months beginning in October.
The producer group is considering a final increase of approximately 188,000 barrels per day in September before holding output steady. The September adjustment would complete the planned restoration of supply removed through earlier voluntary cuts.
A pause would leave around 2 million barrels per day of wider OPEC+ restrictions in place. It would also allow the group to evaluate the Middle East conflict, global demand conditions and the sustainable production capacity of individual members before making further changes.
No final decision has been taken. Future supply policy will depend partly on whether the conflict disrupts physical exports and whether oil demand remains resilient as central banks maintain restrictive monetary policies.
Nevertheless, the prospect of unchanged quotas from October removes one potential source of additional supply. This provides a firmer price floor at a time when the security of existing Gulf production remains uncertain.
The July 29 rebound shows that traders may have removed the Middle East risk premium too quickly during the brief pause in fighting. Brent’s return towards $88 and WTI’s rise above $82 reflect renewed concern that military escalation could affect Saudi energy infrastructure or further restrict shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.
Falling US crude inventories and the possibility of an OPEC+ production pause have strengthened the recovery, making the rally broader than a reaction to military headlines alone.
Oil prices are likely to remain highly volatile as the market weighs diplomatic efforts against physical shipping data and the risk of further attacks. A durable ceasefire and a clear framework for reopening Hormuz could reduce the supply premium again. Without those developments, traders may continue pricing a greater probability of disruption into Brent and WTI.
Risk Warning: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, investment research, or a recommendation to trade. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Markets.com. When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange), and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Leveraged products can result in capital loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Before trading, ensure you fully understand the risks involved and consider your investment objectives and level of experience. Cryptocurrency CFD trading restrictions may apply depending on jurisdiction.